Tackling Technical Debt: Empowering Marketers to Overcome its Impact
As marketers, we know how crucial it is to offer customer-centric products and services delivered in a seamless user experience. But here’s the thing: technical debt can put all that at risk.
It can compromise the quality and functionality of what we offer, leading to bad reviews, unhappy customers, and, let’s face it, lower revenue.
In this article, we’ll dive into what we mean by “technical debt”, why it matters so much to us marketers (and to our organization as a whole), and most importantly, why we should do everything in our power to avoid technical debt in the first place.
What is Technical Debt?
Let’s take a step back and break down what technical debt means. Think of it as the aftermath of taking shortcuts during the software development, implementation, or integration processes just to meet immediate business needs or deadlines.
These shortcuts can come in different forms, like using outdated or inefficient technologies, underestimating project costs, skipping important steps like user acceptance criteria, unit testing, or code reviews, not thoroughly evaluating technology choices, and neglecting proper documentation or refactoring the code when needed.
Like financial debt, technical debt piles up over time as more code gets built on top of the existing codebase. And just like financial debt accrues interest, technical debt brings its own consequences. For example, it can result in higher maintenance costs, reduced productivity, and a decline in the quality and reliability of the software.
To effectively manage technical debt, software development, and technical operations teams must strike a balance between the need for speed and the need for quality and maintainability. By emphasizing the importance of maintaining this balance, we can address technical debt head-on and ensure that our software remains robust, efficient, and up to par.
But Why Should Marketers Care?
Marketers should pay attention to technical debt because it directly impacts the quality and functionality of the solutions we’re promoting.
Here’s the thing: technical debt can make the software we rely on more prone to bugs, data discrepancies, crashes, and other pesky issues that can seriously harm the user experience (both for the marketer and the people we’re marketing to). And you know what happens when users have a bad experience, right? Reduced customer satisfaction, negative reviews, and, worst of all, lower revenue.
But it doesn’t stop there. Technical debt can also throw a wrench into the gears of innovation. It can slow down the team, making implementing new features and updates more challenging and time-consuming. Imagine competing with other companies who quickly adapt and improve while we’re struggling to catch up with our competitors due to outdated technology and data. That’s not a good look, and it’s definitely not good for business. Plus, its strain on our internal resources can lead to missed opportunities to capitalize on emerging trends.
The real kicker: technical debt creates broken processes that can really burn marketers out. Constantly dealing with software issues and fixing and reporting bugs instead of focusing on marketing strategies and campaigns is a recipe for exhaustion and frustration.
We need smooth workflows and efficient tools to do our job effectively and enthusiastically.
When Marketing Suffers Due to Tech Debt
As you can see, tech debt creates real challenges for marketers in their day-to-day responsibilities. For example, when marketers encounter unresolved technical issues or outdated systems, it can hinder their ability to execute campaigns effectively, analyze data accurately, and deliver results that lead to sustainable business results.
Here are five examples of how tech debt negatively impacts marketing teams:
1.Slow & Inefficient Processes
Accumulated tech debt often leads to complex and convoluted workflows, making routine tasks time-consuming and error-prone.
For instance, a marketing and sales team using an outdated CRM platform can create limited automation capabilities. This debt has a significant trickle effect on anything from updating a field time to deploying updates that may be required for accurate lead nurturing. The operations team ultimately takes precious time to sustain an inefficient and undesired platform.
2. Data Inaccuracy in Reporting
Tech debt can significantly compromise data integrity, making it difficult for marketers to trust the information they rely on for decision-making. In addition, outdated or poorly integrated systems might cause data discrepancies, duplicate records, or incomplete analytics reports.
Let’s use the example of Marketing Attribution in this scenario. When your systems are not integrated as they should, and your data is incomplete, it’s hard for both sales and marketing to understand where to place their best bets in the channels that might result in more revenue. This can result in extraordinary spending on the wrong channels and efforts because poor data might have pointed a marketer in one direction over another.
In the case of Envestnet/Yodlee, this was an all too familiar story. However, after working with the team to set KPIs and moving to a modern attribution infrastructure (Marketo Measure / Salesforce / Tableau), delivering data cleanliness, and correct reporting, they were able to surface hidden gaps within their pipeline. This resulted in the marketing team’s better understanding of where to focus their efforts to drive more revenue growth for the organization.
3. Inability to Adapt to Market Trends
Rapid advancements in technology and shifts in market behavior require marketers to be agile and adaptable. However, tech debt can hinder their ability to leverage new marketing channels, tools, or strategies.
For example, suppose marketers are trying to go to market in an ABM (account-based marketing) motion but are tied to legacy systems. In that case, it’s very likely they will lack integration capabilities with emerging platforms that allow for intent data and targeting against key accounts, like 6sense, for example.
Due to this, they may miss out on potential opportunities to engage with their target audiences and key accounts effectively and in a more automated manner.
4. Limited Personalization & Targeting
Marketing relies on delivering personalized experiences and targeted messaging to relevant segments. However, tech debt can limit marketers’ ability to effectively collect, analyze, and leverage customer data.
Outdated or fragmented systems can pose a real challenge when implementing robust customer segmentation, accurately targeting audiences/personas, and delivering tailored marketing campaigns that truly connect with individual customer needs and preferences.
For example, you want to deploy a persona-driven marketing journey for new and existing customers. In this scenario, the marketer does not have access to CRM directly but has access to the marketing automation and the display advertising platforms to deploy campaigns. They see there is a field readily available that’s called “Personas”. On the surface, it looks like that field checks out, so they choose that field to segment their audience against.
What happens? Marketers may unknowingly make poorly-informed decisions relying on a flawed data point. This scenario is not unique and can result in several challenges based on poorly constructed tech, leaving debt in the wake of the marketer’s path. Those challenges can be anything from that single Persona field resulting in:
- A field mapped to the wrong data
- A field mapped to no data
- A field that is no longer in use
- A field mapped to automation that isn’t desired for this program
- A field that doesn’t map back to CRM for data accuracy
- The list can really go on and on.